Red and affordable. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 not only convinces with its affordable price but also its dual-camera, its metal case and its capable SoC. Find out in this review whether the Redmi Note 5’s performance is as impressive as its smartphones are becoming increasingly more popular in Europe, particularly the Redmi series. Redmi devices have always combined good quality at a reasonable price. The Note 5 is a phablet with a display, a mid-range SoC, fast Wi-Fi and a dual-camera all for under €240 ~$277. For reference, our review unit is the M1803E7SG. This is also known as the Redmi Note 5 AI Dual Camera. It is neither the Redmi 5 Plus, which is listed as the Redmi Note 5 on Xiaomi's Mi website, nor is it the Redmi Note 5 Pro either. All three devices are powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SoC, but they feature different camera hardware and memory options among other differences. We have chosen to compare the Note 5 against the Motorola Moto G6 Plus, the Huawei Y7 2018, the Maze Alpha X and the Honor 7X. Find out in this review how the Note 5 compares with similarly priced competitors and whether it continues the Redmi series inch 21, 2160 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy yesStorage32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB , 24 GB freeConnections1 USB 1 Infrared, Audio Connections mm headphone jack, Card Reader microSD up to 256 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity sensor, Compass, Fingerprint a/b/g/n/ac a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/, Bluetooth GSM 850/​900/​1800/​1900, UMTS 850/​900/​1900/​2100, LTE Band 1/3/7/8/20/38/40, Dual SIM, LTE, GPSSizeheight x width x depth in mm x x = x x in Wh, 4000 mAh Lithium-PolymerOperating SystemAndroid OreoCameraPrimary Camera 12 MPix Main camera 12 MP, f/ Phase detection AF dual-pixel, dual LED flash, videos in up to 1080p at 30 FPS. Secondary Camera 5 MP, f/ depth of field DOFSecondary Camera 13 MPix 13 MP, f/ LED flash, videos in up to 1080p at 30 FPSAdditional featuresSpeakers Mono speaker on the underside of the device, Keyboard Virtual keyboard, USB Type-A to Micro USB cable, Quick charger, SIM tool, protective cover, MIUI 9, MI remote, Cleaner, Mi Video, 24 Months Warranty, LTE 600 Mbps Download; 150 Mbps Upload. SAR values W/kg head; W/kg body. FM radio., fanlessWeight180 g = oz / pounds, Power Supply 61 g = oz / poundsNote The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar Note 5 is available in Lake Blue, Black, Gold and Rose Gold. Our test device is the Rose Gold variant, which has a white front. The Note 5 has a metal case, which proved to be stable during our tests. Our test device did not react to pressure applied to the back of the case, while light pressure on the display causes slight waves in the LCD. Our test device withstood our attempts to bend and twist it, with hardly any creaks or cracking noises when doing so. The design is not exceptional, but it is stylish. The metal back is sandwiched between color matching plastic areas designed to improve the reception quality. The display is flush with the case but for a slight edge. This is deliberate though and is a relatively smooth edge. The Note 5 weighs 180 g ~ oz and measures x x mm ~ x ~3 x ~ in. This weight and dimension help the device to feel good in the hand. The rear-facing camera array protrudes slightly from the case, so the Note 5 is slightly unstable on flat surfaces. Motorola Moto G6 Plus Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Huawei Y7 2018 Maze Alpha X Huawei Honor 7X DIN A6 ❌160 mm / inch mm / inch 8 mm / inch 167 mm / inch mm / inch mm / inch 180 mm / inch mm / inch mm / inch 155 mm / inch mm / inch mm / inch 210 mm / inch mm / inch mm / inch 165 lbs148 mm / inch 105 mm / inch 1 mm / inch lbsOur test device has 3 GB of RAM and 32 GB of internal storage. There is also a 64 GB/4 GB option, which we would recommend over our test device as they are currently equally priced online. The Note 5 is a Dual-SIM device and supports microSD cards up to 256 GB. MicroSD cards can only be formatted as external storage, which means that app data can only be stored on the 32 GB of internal storage. Incidentally, the card tray has only two slots, so you can either use two nano-SIMs or one SIM and a microSD card. The Note 5 features an FM radio, Bluetooth and a fingerprint sensor. There is even an IR remote that can be used as a remote control. Unfortunately, there is only a microUSB port instead of a USB Type-C port. The microUSB port is only USB albeit this supports USB Note 5 ships with Android Oreo which has been customized with Xiaomi’s MIUI. Our test device is running MIUI Global and Android security patch level March 1st 2018, which was about six weeks old at the time of writing. MIUI looks different than the UI on many other Android smartphones, with Xiaomi implementing numerous changes from stock Android. MIUI should not take Android users too much time to adapt though. Frustratingly, we could not change the screen timeout as the button to confirm the change is missing. Equally frustrating is the energy-saving features, which are overly restrictive. Runtastic, for example, ran correctly only after changing numerous settings. The Note 5 comes with many additional apps, most of which are by Xiaomi. Fortunately, there is little bloatware except for one social network app. The Note 5 is equipped with fast IEEE ac Wi-Fi, which is rare for a €240 ~$277 device and one that will make many users happy. While the Note 5 cannot match the Motorola G6 Plus in terms of Wi-Fi performance, the Note 5 is faster than all our other comparison devices. We calculated this performance using our Linksys EA8500 reference router. Our test device loaded websites quickly when we were close to the router, but we did have to wait for some images to load. The Note 5 still had full Wi-Fi reception when we took the device around ten meters ~33 ft away from the router with three walls between the two devices. Websites loaded just as fast as they do when we tested the Note 5 with it close to our reference router. The Note 5 supports seven LTE bands, which is rather paltry in comparison to other devices. In practice, this means that you may struggle with connecting to an LTE network in more exotic countries. Our test device had good mobile network reception on the German D2 network. We still had good reception even in buildings in built-up iperf3 transmit AX12Average of class Smartphone - 1368, n=63, last 2 years 528 MBit/s ∼100% +93%Motorola Moto G6 PlusAdreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash 311 MBit/s ∼59% +14%Xiaomi Redmi Note 5Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash 273 MBit/s ∼52% Maze Alpha XMali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash MBit/s ∼18% -65%Huawei Y7 2018Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash MBit/s ∼11% -79%Huawei Honor 7XMali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash 47 MBit/s ∼9% -83% iperf3 receive AX12Average of class Smartphone - 953, n=64, last 2 years 497 MBit/s ∼100% +85%Motorola Moto G6 PlusAdreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash 310 MBit/s ∼62% +16%Xiaomi Redmi Note 5Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash 268 MBit/s ∼54% Maze Alpha XMali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash MBit/s ∼17% -69%Huawei Y7 2018Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash 55 MBit/s ∼11% -79%Huawei Honor 7XMali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash MBit/s ∼9% -83%The Note 5 struggled to locate us when indoors. Although there is a satellite signal, it cannot locate us. Things improved when we moved to a window, where the Note 5 located us to an accuracy of nine meters ~30 ft. Location accuracy drastically improves outdoors though, with our test device being accurate to three meters ~10 ft. This is an impressive location accuracy given the Note 5’s price. The Note 5 has a compass, which quickly indicates our direction in Google Maps. We took the Note 5 on a bike ride to test its location accuracy against a professional navigation device, the Garmin Edge 520. Our test device performed well, but it is far more inaccurate than the Garmin. The Note 5 deviated by 120 m ~394 ft from the Garmin, which represents a accuracy compared to the professional navigation device. The Huawei Y7 2018 has better location accuracy than the Note 5, but the latter should be suitable for all general navigation Note 5 uses Xiaomi’s phone app, which is much like Google’s standard phone app. Launching the app brings up the keypad and a list of recent calls. There is a small search window in which you can search directly for contacts. Alternatively, you bring up your contact list by clicking the contacts tab. The phone app has numerous settings such as a phone number blacklist and call recording among other Note 5 has good call quality. Our call partner sounded clear and without any background noise. Our test device reproduced our voice well, but the microphone distorted if we spoke too loudly. The opposite is true over the speakerphone, where the microphone struggled to pick out our voice if we spoke softly. Our counterpart is still easy to understand, albeit there is some mild background noise during quieter photograph using the front-facing cameraThe Note 5 has dual rear-facing cameras, one 12 MP and one 5 MP. The secondary camera is only used to help create depth of field bokeh effect photographs and it cannot be used as a standalone camera. Photos taken with the main camera have fewer details than those taken with more premium smartphones, with some areas coming out particularly muddy and lacking definition. Our test device gets the exposure right in dark areas in good lighting and there is even some detail in very bright areas. Low-light performance is surprisingly good, but there is a clear blue tint to the photos. The Apple iPhone X captures night shots more accurately, but the latter costs practically five times as much as the Note 5. Overall, the Note 5 has an impressive rear-facing camera array given its main camera can record videos in up to 1080p at 30 FPS. The video quality is passable, although bright areas are often underexposed, while dark areas lack detail. Recordings are sharp though. There is a 120 FPS slow motion feature, which is recorded at Note 5 has a 13 MP front-facing camera, which in theory could make the Note 5 a selfie star. While the Note 5 does well for a more affordable device, it does not come close to more premium smartphones. Dark areas are exposed well, but bright areas often dominate a photograph. Sharpness is rather average too, but the front-facing camera reproduces colors well. Image ComparisonChoose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test 1Scene 2Scene 3click to load images The Note 5 does not fare much better under controlled lighting conditions either. Sharpness is passable, with our test device reproducing text against a colored background well. Transitions between colors appear pixelated, but this is still ok for a device at this price. Generally, images are overly dark, particularly color Note 5 comes with a quick charger, a USB cable, a SIM tool and a protective cover. Xiaomi does not offer any dedicated accessories on its Note 5 does not come with a manufacturer’s warranty in Europe seeing as Xiaomi are a Chinese company. You will get twenty-four months warranty if you buy through an EU supplier though. Please see our Guarantees, Return policies and Warranties FAQ for country-specific has installed Google GBoard as the Note 5’s default keyboard. Other keyboards are available from the Google Play Store. The Note 5 has a touchscreen that has a slick, smooth surface. Touch inputs are precise even at the corners and at the edges of the display. There is a fingerprint sensor on the back of the device that quickly and reliably unlocks our test device. The fingerprint sensor does not have any special gestures or configurable commands like we have seen on other devices, such as the ASUS ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro. There is a software-based quick ball which displays selected links when you click on them. This feature is less functional than using the standard on-screen navigation buttons though. Whereas opening a link with the quick ball takes a total of two clicks, using the standard navigation buttons takes just one click. A supplementary input method should increase functionality and ease of use in our opinion, rather than further complicate matters. The hardware buttons can be found on the right-hand side of the case. These feel premium, are easy to use and have a clear pressure point. Sub-pixel arrayThe Note 5 has a display with a 21 aspect ratio. The display has a 2,160x1,080 native resolution, which results in a pixel density of 403 PPI. Our test device has an impressively bright display, which averaged cd/m² using X-Rite i1Pro 2. Only the Motorola Moto G6 Plus has a brighter display of our comparison devices, with the Honor 7X scoring just slightly lower than the Note 5. The Moto G6 Plus is an outlier in this respect though with its 723 cd/m² average maximum luminosity. This is incredibly bright for a device at this price. The Note 5 has 94% display uniformity too, which is at least 4% better than the best of our comparison devices. In practical terms, this means that the large areas of color look uniformly bright. It is worth pointing out that we achieved this level of luminosity with the device on charge and with the brightness sensor turned off. Measuring our test device either on battery or with the brightness sensor turned on results in a lower average maximum brightness value. 541cd/m²512cd/m²547cd/m²537cd/m²518cd/m²528cd/m²539cd/m²522cd/m²546cd/m² Distribution of brightnessX-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum 547 cd/m² Nits Average cd/m² Minimum cd/m²Brightness Distribution 94 %Center on Battery 448 cd/m²Contrast 22521 Black cd/m²ΔE Color Greyscale sRGB Calman 2DGamma Redmi Note 5IPS, 2160x1080, Alpha XIPS, 2160x1080, Moto G6 PlusIPS, 2160x1080, Honor 7XIPS, 2160x1080, Y7 2018IPS, 1440x720, middle518497 -4%761 47% 3%393 -24%Brightness532478 -10%723 36%511 -4%365 -31%Brightness Distribution9487 -7%90 -4%88 -6%85 -10%Black Level * -161% -200% -52% -26%Contrast2252828 -63%1103 -51%1523 -32%1355 -40%Colorchecker dE 2000 * -105% 58% 50% 7%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * -114% 50% 35%9 13%Greyscale dE 2000 * -99% 74% 46% 38% 97% 75% 100% 116% 85%CCT8564 76%9955 65%6312 103%6918 94%7086 92%* ... smaller is better Screen Flickering / PWM Pulse-Width ModulationℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation PWM . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness settingThe display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz Likely utilizing PWM Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any comparison 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19024 minimum 5 - maximum 3846000 Hz was measured. The Note 5 has a cd/m² black value that is both notably good and significantly better than our comparison devices. This low black value helps our test device achieve a laudable 2,2521 contrast ratio that is leagues ahead of our comparison devices. This helps make colors pop and gives black tones a rich quality to them. We subjected our test device to our spectrophotometer and CalMAN software to get a more detailed look at the display. The results highlight a significant blue tint to the display, which results in light blue and orange tones looking noticeably different than the sRGB reference color. The color space coverage is good overall, but the blue tint is one downside. Unfortunately, the Note 5 uses pulse-width modulation PWM to regulate luminosity at and below 20% brightness. We notice a flicker to the display when the brightness is at this level, which we measured at 2,358 Hz. This frequency should be high enough for those who are PWM sensitive not to feel any ill effects, although this cannot be guaranteed. Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry ghosting. Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise↘ 17 ms fallThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 240 maximum ms. » 55 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices ms. ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey50 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise↘ 27 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for comparison, all tested devices range from minimum to 636 maximum ms. » 83 % of all devices are means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices 35 ms. The Note 5 has a relatively bright display, which helps when using the device outdoors. We could still see screen content with brightness set to maximum if we were not in too bright an area. The display has a glossy finish though, so reflections cannot be avoided. The Note 5 has an IPS display, which helps to give the device strong viewing angles. There are slight brightness and color shifts at acute viewing angles, but these are picked up more by the camera than they are noticeable by the naked Note 5 is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SoC, a mid-range SoC that Qualcomm announced late last year. The Snapdragon 636 has an octa-core Kyro 260 CPU that clocks up to GHz. The Snapdragon 636 is a significant improvement on its predecessor, the Snapdragon 630 that powers the Moto G6 Plus. The Snapdragon 636 helps the Note 5 to typically perform around 20% faster than the G6 Plus in benchmarks. Equally, the Note 5 feels snappy in practice, with our test device not slowing down even when we have numerous programs open in the Snapdragon 636 integrates a Qualcomm Adreno 509 GPU that supports DirectX OpenGL ES OpenCL and Direct3D 12. This support for modern graphics APIs should ensure that the Note 5 is future proofed at least in terms of graphics. While the Note 5 has faster GPU performance than our comparison devices too, the gap is not as great as in our CPU v6 - Total Score sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 92672 Points ∼95% Maze Alpha X 63989 Points ∼65% -31%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 71635 Points ∼73% -23%Huawei Honor 7X 62810 Points ∼64% -32%Huawei Y7 2018 45687 Points ∼47% -51%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 92015 - 125213, n=10 98051 Points ∼100% +6%AnTuTu v7 - Total Score sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 115654 Points ∼97% Maze Alpha X 73822 Points ∼62% -36%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 90347 Points ∼76% -22%Huawei Honor 7X 81992 Points ∼69% -29%Huawei Y7 2018 59421 Points ∼50% -49%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 115565 - 138661, n=11 118863 Points ∼100% +3%PCMark for Android Work performance score sort by valueMaze Alpha X 4562 Points ∼36% Motorola Moto G6 Plus 5712 Points ∼45% Huawei Honor 7X 6213 Points ∼49% Huawei Y7 2018 4918 Points ∼39% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 6040 - 7618, n=11 6624 Points ∼52% Average of class Smartphone 9875 - 19297, n=4, last 2 years 12669 Points ∼100% Work performance score sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 5642 Points ∼60% Maze Alpha X 3795 Points ∼40% -33%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 4875 Points ∼52% -14%Huawei Honor 7X 4859 Points ∼51% -14%Huawei Y7 2018 3874 Points ∼41% -31%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 5611 - 6277, n=11 5833 Points ∼62% +3%Average of class Smartphone 5279 - 12871, n=25, last 2 years 9453 Points ∼100% +68%BaseMark OS II Overall sort by valueMaze Alpha X 1424 Points ∼28% Motorola Moto G6 Plus 1535 Points ∼30% Huawei Honor 7X 1334 Points ∼26% Huawei Y7 2018 1020 Points ∼20% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 1734 - 2156, n=10 1957 Points ∼38% Average of class Smartphone 411 - 9585, n=163, last 2 years 5118 Points ∼100% System sort by valueMaze Alpha X 3064 Points ∼35% Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3249 Points ∼37% Huawei Honor 7X 2899 Points ∼33% Huawei Y7 2018 1906 Points ∼22% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 4320 - 5348, n=10 4559 Points ∼51% Average of class Smartphone 2565 - 19657, n=163, last 2 years 8863 Points ∼100% Memory sort by valueMaze Alpha X 1294 Points ∼23% Motorola Moto G6 Plus 1213 Points ∼22% Huawei Honor 7X 1788 Points ∼32% Huawei Y7 2018 1144 Points ∼20% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 1236 - 2492, n=10 1958 Points ∼35% Average of class Smartphone 670 - 11617, n=163, last 2 years 5627 Points ∼100% Graphics sort by valueMaze Alpha X 1122 Points ∼10% Motorola Moto G6 Plus 1523 Points ∼14% Huawei Honor 7X 845 Points ∼8% Huawei Y7 2018 739 Points ∼7% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 1590 - 1632, n=10 1608 Points ∼14% Average of class Smartphone 697 - 30125, n=163, last 2 years 11132 Points ∼100% Web sort by valueMaze Alpha X 924 Points ∼64% Motorola Moto G6 Plus 925 Points ∼64% Huawei Honor 7X 724 Points ∼50% Huawei Y7 2018 673 Points ∼47% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 876 - 1088, n=10 1037 Points ∼72% Average of class Smartphone 10 - 2392, n=163, last 2 years 1446 Points ∼100% Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Core Score sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 1339 Points ∼31% Maze Alpha X 833 Points ∼19% -38%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 822 Points ∼19% -39%Huawei Honor 7X 869 Points ∼20% -35%Huawei Y7 2018 676 Points ∼16% -50%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 1323 - 1506, n=11 1351 Points ∼31% +1%Average of class Smartphone 783 - 8424, n=79, last 2 years 4319 Points ∼100% +223% 64 Bit Multi-Core Score sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 4943 Points ∼43% Maze Alpha X 3795 Points ∼33% -23%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 4011 Points ∼35% -19%Huawei Honor 7X 3342 Points ∼29% -32%Huawei Y7 2018 2889 Points ∼25% -42%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 4781 - 5426, n=11 4960 Points ∼43% 0%Average of class Smartphone 2630 - 21505, n=79, last 2 years 11407 Points ∼100% +131% Compute RenderScript Score sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 4578 Points ∼53% Maze Alpha X 2726 Points ∼32% -40%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3763 Points ∼44% -18%Huawei Honor 7X 2772 Points ∼32% -39%Huawei Y7 2018 2133 Points ∼25% -53%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 4278 - 5041, n=11 4505 Points ∼52% -2%Average of class Smartphone 2053 - 14785, n=65, last 2 years 8628 Points ∼100% +88%3DMark1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 20033 Points ∼30% Maze Alpha X 14012 Points ∼21% -30%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 16818 Points ∼25% -16%Huawei Honor 7X 10882 Points ∼16% -46%Huawei Y7 2018 9583 Points ∼14% -52%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 19525 - 20404, n=11 19846 Points ∼30% -1%Average of class Smartphone 32630 - 113147, n=4, last 2 years 67072 Points ∼100% +235%1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 20909 Points ∼20% Maze Alpha X 13708 Points ∼13% -34%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 18449 Points ∼17% -12%Huawei Honor 7X 10332 Points ∼10% -51%Huawei Y7 2018 9713 Points ∼9% -54%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 20610 - 21067, n=11 20839 Points ∼19% 0%Average of class Smartphone 48592 - 200519, n=4, last 2 years 106932 Points ∼100% +411%1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 17471 Points ∼58% Maze Alpha X 15189 Points ∼50% -13%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 12845 Points ∼43% -26%Huawei Honor 7X 13372 Points ∼44% -23%Huawei Y7 2018 9153 Points ∼30% -48%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 15766 - 19365, n=11 17020 Points ∼56% -3%Average of class Smartphone 15179 - 44810, n=4, last 2 years 30190 Points ∼100% +73%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 1458 Points ∼43% Maze Alpha X 1034 Points ∼31% -29%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 1348 Points ∼40% -8%Huawei Honor 7X 622 Points ∼19% -57%Huawei Y7 2018 603 Points ∼18% -59%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 1458 - 1493, n=11 1475 Points ∼44% +1%Average of class Smartphone 574 - 9221, n=97, last 2 years 3356 Points ∼100% +130%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES Graphics sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 1313 Points ∼36% Maze Alpha X 928 Points ∼25% -29%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 1258 Points ∼34% -4%Huawei Honor 7X 528 Points ∼14% -60%Huawei Y7 2018 524 Points ∼14% -60%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 1313 - 1353, n=11 1331 Points ∼36% +1%Average of class Smartphone 517 - 13263, n=97, last 2 years 3650 Points ∼100% +178%2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES Physics sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 2379 Points ∼80% Maze Alpha X 1725 Points ∼58% -27%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 1802 Points ∼61% -24%Huawei Honor 7X 1656 Points ∼56% -30%Huawei Y7 2018 1280 Points ∼43% -46%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 1349 - 2626, n=11 2280 Points ∼77% -4%Average of class Smartphone 937 - 4609, n=97, last 2 years 2977 Points ∼100% +25%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme ES sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 934 Points ∼37% Maze Alpha X 699 Points ∼28% -25%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 833 Points ∼33% -11%Huawei Honor 7X 409 Points ∼16% -56%Huawei Y7 2018 310 Points ∼12% -67%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 934 - 962, n=11 950 Points ∼38% +2%Average of class Smartphone 286 - 7890, n=127, last 2 years 2510 Points ∼100% +169%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme ES Graphics sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 797 Points ∼32% Maze Alpha X 598 Points ∼24% -25%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 721 Points ∼29% -10%Huawei Honor 7X 338 Points ∼13% -58%Huawei Y7 2018 255 Points ∼10% -68%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 797 - 818, n=11 812 Points ∼32% +2%Average of class Smartphone 240 - 9814, n=127, last 2 years 2515 Points ∼100% +216%2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme ES Physics sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 2346 Points ∼78% Maze Alpha X 1700 Points ∼57% -28%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 1822 Points ∼61% -22%Huawei Honor 7X 1553 Points ∼52% -34%Huawei Y7 2018 1258 Points ∼42% -46%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 2251 - 2634, n=11 2358 Points ∼79% +1%Average of class Smartphone 858 - 4679, n=127, last 2 years 2998 Points ∼100% +28%GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark T-Rex Onscreen sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 35 fps ∼44% Maze Alpha X 21 fps ∼26% -40%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 28 fps ∼35% -20%Huawei Honor 7X 18 fps ∼23% -49%Huawei Y7 2018 27 fps ∼34% -23%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 30 - 40, n=12 fps ∼43% -2%Average of class Smartphone 22 - 165, n=188, last 2 years fps ∼100% +127%1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 35 fps ∼18% Maze Alpha X 24 fps ∼12% -31%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 30 fps ∼15% -14%Huawei Honor 7X 19 fps ∼10% -46%Huawei Y7 2018 16 fps ∼8% -54%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 35 - 36, n=12 fps ∼18% +2%Average of class Smartphone 19 - 497, n=188, last 2 years fps ∼100% +470%GFXBench screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 15 fps ∼22% Maze Alpha X fps ∼14% -37%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 13 fps ∼19% -13%Huawei Honor 7X fps ∼12% -47%Huawei Y7 2018 14 fps ∼21% -7%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 13 - 18, n=12 15 fps ∼22% 0%Average of class Smartphone - 161, n=189, last 2 years fps ∼100% +345%1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 16 fps ∼14% Maze Alpha X 11 fps ∼10% -31%Motorola Moto G6 Plus 14 fps ∼12% -12%Huawei Honor 7X 8 fps ∼7% -50%Huawei Y7 2018 fps ∼6% -56%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 16 - 16, n=12 16 fps ∼14% 0%Average of class Smartphone - 331, n=190, last 2 years fps ∼100% +606%GFXBench screen Manhattan ES Onscreen sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 10 fps ∼19% Maze Alpha X 6 fps ∼11% -40%Motorola Moto G6 Plus fps ∼18% -6%Huawei Honor 7X fps ∼8% -55%Huawei Y7 2018 10 fps ∼19% 0%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 - 12, n=12 fps ∼18% -5%Average of class Smartphone - 143, n=190, last 2 years fps ∼100% +434%1920x1080 Manhattan ES Offscreen sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 fps ∼13% Maze Alpha X fps ∼5% -62%Motorola Moto G6 Plus fps ∼13% 0%Huawei Honor 7X fps ∼6% -52%Huawei Y7 2018 fps ∼6% -53%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 - 10, n=12 fps ∼13% -1%Average of class Smartphone - 223, n=190, last 2 years fps ∼100% +684%GFXBenchon screen Car Chase Onscreen sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 6 fps ∼17% Maze Alpha X fps ∼10% -40%Motorola Moto G6 Plus fps ∼15% -12%Huawei Honor 7X fps ∼8% -52%Huawei Y7 2018 fps ∼15% -10%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 - n=12 fps ∼16% -1%Average of class Smartphone 5 - 110, n=190, last 2 years fps ∼100% +505%1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen sort by valueXiaomi Redmi Note 5 fps ∼13% Maze Alpha X fps ∼9% -35%Motorola Moto G6 Plus fps ∼12% -11%Huawei Honor 7X fps ∼6% -54%Huawei Y7 2018 fps ∼6% -59%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 - n=12 fps ∼13% 0%Average of class Smartphone - 166, n=190, last 2 years fps ∼100% +644%LegendMaze Alpha X Mediatek Helio P25, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 64 GB eMMC FlashHuawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC FlashThe Note 5 performs better than our comparison devices in browser benchmarks too. Our test device even outperformed slightly more expensive devices. Complex HTML 5 websites like Google Interland are displayed fluidly, which is reflective of our real-world use. While the Note 5 is not as fast at loading websites as premium smartphones, it is sufficient for general web - Total ScoreAverage of class Smartphone - 414, n=76, last 2 years 135 Points ∼100% +205%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 - n=11 Points ∼34% +2%Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Chrome 67 Points ∼33% Huawei Honor 7X Chrome Points ∼23% -29%Motorola Moto G6 Plus Chrome 66 Points ∼21% -37%Maze Alpha X Chrome Version 64 Points ∼20% -38%Huawei Y7 2018 Chrome 66 Points ∼13% -60%Octane V2 - Total ScoreAverage of class Smartphone 4633 - 74261, n=194, last 2 years 29470 Points ∼100% +250%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 8163 - 9746, n=12 8665 Points ∼29% +3%Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Chrome 67 8422 Points ∼29% Huawei Honor 7X Chrome 5302 Points ∼18% -37%Motorola Moto G6 Plus Chrome 66 5011 Points ∼17% -41%Maze Alpha X Chrome Version 64 4990 Points ∼17% -41%Huawei Y7 2018 Chrome 66 3363 Points ∼11% -60%Mozilla Kraken - Total ScoreHuawei Y7 2018 Chrome 66 13541 ms * ∼100% -186%Maze Alpha X Chrome Version 64 10244 ms * ∼76% -116%Motorola Moto G6 Plus Chrome 66 9797 ms * ∼72% -107%Huawei Honor 7X Chrome 8684 ms * ∼64% -83%Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Chrome 67 4740 ms * ∼35% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 4105 - 5066, n=12 4688 ms * ∼35% +1%Average of class Smartphone 414 - 10031, n=168, last 2 years 1949 ms * ∼14% +59%WebXPRT 2015 - Overall ScoreXiaomi Redmi Note 5 Chrome 67 158 Points ∼100% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 147 - 184, n=8 158 Points ∼100% 0%Huawei Honor 7X Chrome 111 Points ∼70% -30%Motorola Moto G6 Plus Chrome 66 108 Points ∼68% -32%Huawei Y7 2018 Chrome 66 82 Points ∼52% -48%* ... smaller is betterThe Note 5 is on par with our comparison devices in terms of microSD card performance. We tested the Note 5 with our trusted Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 reference microSD card. The Note 5 is equipped with eMMC memory, which is faster than the average of devices that we tested with 32 GB of eMMC memory. eMMC memory is no match for faster UFS memory though. The Note 5 even struggles against the Moto G6 Plus, which is also equipped with eMMC Redmi Note 5Maze Alpha XMotorola Moto G6 PlusHuawei Honor 7XHuawei Y7 2018Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-58%64%-0%-19%-7%602% Sequential Read -14% 0% -8%256 -11%242 ? - 452, n=244-16%1186 ?215 - 4512, n=231, last 2 years312% Sequential Write 33% 78% 5% -41%100 ? - n=244-18%757 ? - 3062, n=231, last 2 years523% Random Read 44% 19% 66% -21% ? - n=244-12%209 ? - 543, n=231, last 2 years327% Random Write -29% 285% 24% -42% ? - 91, n=24434%219 ?13 - 572, n=232, last 2 years1244% Sequential Read 256KB ?Toshiba Exceria Pro M501-3% ?Toshiba Exceria Pro M5010% -37%85 2% ? - n=178-14% Sequential Write 256KB ?Toshiba Exceria Pro M50119% ?Toshiba Exceria Pro M5010% -51% -1% ? - n=178-15%The Note 5 is suitable for relatively simple mobile games. 60 FPS gaming is possible in less demanding titles like “Shadow Fight 3”, but the Note 5 struggles when we tested it against more demanding titles. “Arena of Valor”, for example, only averaged 31 FPS, while “PUBG Mobile” averaged 25 FPS. This is still high enough for stable gaming though. We would recommend looking at more expensive devices if you want to plan the most cutting-edge mobile games at 60 FPS as the Note 5 is not powerful enough for that. The Note 5 is perfectly suited for games like “Shadow Fight 3” and “Angry Birds 2” though. The positional sensor and touchscreen also worked well throughout our tests. Arena of Valor SettingsValue min31 fps high HD31 fps Your browser does not support the canvas element! Shadow Fight 3 SettingsValue high58 fps minimal59 fps Your browser does not support the canvas element! PUBG Mobile SettingsValue Smooth25 fps Balanced25 fps Your browser does not support the canvas element! GFXBench battery testThe Note 5 is a relatively cool device at idle, with both sides averaging below 30 °C ~86 °F. Maximum temperatures at idle are also below 30 °C ~86 °F, demonstrating the degree of surface temperature uniformity across the whole device. Surface temperatures ramp up under load though, with our test device averaging °C ~97 °F. The front of the device gets slightly hotter than the rear, with the top centre and right of the device reaching °C ~101 °F under load, with the corresponding areas on the rear reaching a more moderate °C ~98 °F. The increase in surface temperatures is noticeable, but the device is still comfortable to hold. Our test device cooled quickly after prolonged use on hot days too, so you should have no problems putting the device in your pockets in such a scenario. Our test device did not throttle in GFXBench’s Manhattan battery test, with framerates remaining stable even after around thirty passes. °C101 °C96 °C96 F °C101 °C96 °C100 F °C100 °C95 °C96 F Maximum °C = 101 FAverage °C = 98 F °C94 °C97 °C98 °C94 °C98 °C98 °C94 °C96 °C98 F Maximum °C = 98 FAverage °C = 96 F Power Supply max. °C = 100 F Room Temperature °C = 71 F Voltcraft IR-260± The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is °C / 98 F, compared to the average of °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.+ The maximum temperature on the upper side is °C / 101 F, compared to the average of °C / 95 F, ranging from to °C for the class Smartphone.+ The bottom heats up to a maximum of °C / 98 F, compared to the average of °C / 93 F+ In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of °C / 91 F. Pink Noise speaker testThe Note 5 has a single speaker on the underside of the device, the maximum volume of which we measured at dBA. This is not particularly loud, but the sound quality is fine. High tones are rather overbearing at maximum volume, but the speaker sings when the volume is turned down slightly. The speaker struggles with reproducing deep mid-tones, while we struggled to pick out individual instruments too. Overall though, the Note 5 has an impressive speaker for its price, albeit with a few Note 5 is equipped with a mm headphone jack and Bluetooth There are currently only a few headphones and speakers that take advantage of Bluetooth but fortunately, the new standard is backwards compatible with all previous Bluetooth standards. The sound quality is good for both outputs. The Note 5 has an inbuilt equalizer to tweak the sound over headphones too, but you will need Xiaomi branded headphones to enable this feature. dBA 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 5Huawei Honor 7XFrequency diagram checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devicesXiaomi Redmi Note 5 audio analysis± speaker loudness is average but good dBBass 100 - 315 Hz- nearly no bass - on average lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz+ balanced mids - only away from median+ mids are linear delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz+ balanced highs - only away from median+ highs are linear delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz± linearity of overall sound is average difference to medianCompared to same class» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 51% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 65%Compared to all devices tested» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 31% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%Huawei Honor 7X audio analysis± speaker loudness is average but good dBBass 100 - 315 Hz- nearly no bass - on average lower than median± linearity of bass is average delta to prev. frequencyMids 400 - 2000 Hz± higher mids - on average higher than median± linearity of mids is average delta to prev. frequencyHighs 2 - 16 kHz± higher highs - on average higher than median± linearity of highs is average delta to prev. frequencyOverall 100 - Hz- overall sound is not linear difference to medianCompared to same class» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 3% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 65%Compared to all devices tested» 97% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 2% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%The Note 5 is a relatively inefficient device, with the big display, high screen brightness and the modern but powerful SoC all taking their toll on power Note 5 is relatively efficient when off and on standby, with our test device consuming W and W respectively. The Note 5 consumes more power than our comparison devices when the display is on though. The Note 5 is anywhere between 12% and 38% less efficient than our comparison devices overall. This is particularly true at maximum load, where our test device consumes W. This is not only significantly higher than our comparison devices, but it is also 19% higher than the average of Snapdragon 636 powered devices that we have currently is no surprise then that Xiaomi has incorporated aggressive background app management to keep power consumption under control. This degree of aggressiveness can lead to problems that need to run in the background though. We had to tweak the settings for Runtastic to work properly, for Redmi Note 54000 mAhMaze Alpha X3900 mAhMotorola Moto G6 Plus3200 mAhHuawei Honor 7X3340 mAhHuawei Y7 20183000 mAhAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption21%38%12%19%11%24%Idle Minimum * 10% 50% -2% 10% ? - n=126% ? - n=176, last 2 years12%Idle Average * 18% 32% 5% 27% ? - n=1215% ? - n=176, last 2 years42%Idle Maximum * 25% 38% 13% 21% ?2 - n=1212% ? - n=176, last 2 years41%Load Average * 21% 34% 17% 6% ? - n=1210% ? - n=176, last 2 years13%Load Maximum * 29% 37% 28% 30% ? - n=1210% ? - n=176, last 2 years13%* ... smaller is betterThe Note 5 has a large 4,000 mAh battery, which helps our test device score impressive runtimes in our battery life tests despite the relatively high power consumption. Our test device lasted fourteen hours and thirty-two minutes in our Wi-Fi battery life test, during which we run a script that simulates the load required to render websites. This runtime is considerably longer than our comparison devices, thanks to the Note 5’s additional battery capacity. Our test device lasted thirty hours at idle, which indicates that the Note 5 should last for two working days with moderate use and even longer if you use infrequently use smartphones. Conversely, the Note 5 should last a full day if you use the device a lot, with our test device lasting four hours and eighteen minutes in our continuous stress provides a 10-W quick charger in the box, which fully recharges the Note 5 in under two Runtime Idle without WLAN, min brightness 30h 24min WiFi Websurfing 14h 32min Big Buck Bunny 1080p 15h 02min Load maximum brightness 4h 18min Pros+ plenty of CPU and GPU power for the money + good call quality + long battery life + bright and high contrast display + Bluetooth and ac WiFi + reasonable surface temperatures under load + current version of Android + no throttlingCons- relatively high power consumption - strong blue tint to the display - the microphone is frequently too sensitive - the OS is sometimes restrictive for appsThe Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 in review. Test device courtesy of Redmi Note 5 is the epitome of Xiaomi’s ethos of releasing affordable but high-performance devices and demonstrates why many are longing for a European wide launch of their devices. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 is an affordable smartphone that has plenty of power, good battery life, fast ac Wi-Fi, and a bright and high-contrast display for under €240 ~$277. The Note 5 has a good speaker too, while call quality is decent and the Quick Charge support is handy. The modern SoC gives the Note 5 relatively fast LTE speeds, Bluetooth and should future proof it for the foreseeable future. There are some drawbacks though. The color temperature and a blue tint to the display are not great, and neither is the relatively high power consumption despite the impressive battery life. MIUI employs aggressive app management to its detriment too. This can lead to problems with apps that need to run in the background, but it does help to reduce power consumption and lengthen the battery life. The camera is the only area where the Note 5 is clearly a mid-range device, but photos are adequate overall. Surface temperatures are ok too, albeit they could be better under load. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 is great value for money. The device has excellent performance for its price while delivering a bright display among other Note 5 has outstanding performance for its price and often even outperforms more expensive competitors. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 receives a recommendation from us for this reason alone, despite its minor drawbacks. Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 - 06/25/2018 v6old Florian Wimmer Connectivity44 / 60 → 74% Games Performance45 / 63 → 71% Application Performance56 / 70 → 80% Smartphone - Weighted Average Pricecompare Editor of the original article Florian Schmitt - Managing Editor Mobile - 1034 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2009I initially wrote about gaming laptops when I joined Notebookcheck in 2009. I was then involved with the setup of the comparison portal Notebookinfo and worked with social media concepts for large companies like BMW and Adidas, while also returning to work for Notebookcheck in 2012. Nowadays, I focus on smartphones, tablets, and future technologies. Since 2018 I have been Managing Editor for mobile device reviews, working alongside my colleague Daniel Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 8076 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018Prior to writing and translating for Notebookcheck, I worked for various companies including Apple and Neowin. I have a BA in International History and Politics from the University of Leeds, which I have since converted to a Law Degree. Happy to chat on Twitter or Notebookchat. Florian Wimmer, 2018-06-27 Update 2019-03- 9

XiaomiRedmi Note 5 Pro Whyred #keluhan : mati dicolok charger hanya kedip kedip lampu indikator pengisian putih ( white blinking ) Eksekusi : sesuai

PelayananPDAM Minahasa Sulawesi Utara Banjir Keluhan, Warga Sampai Gunakan Air Hujan Untuk Minum 12 jam lalu . Gempa 5,2 SR Guncang Sumut Jumat 5 Agustus 2022, Guncang di Laut, Ini Info Terkini BMKG HP Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 6/64GB Bekas Fullset Mulus Nominus Original - Jakarta Timur 5 jam lalu - DKI Jakarta. Motor Yamaha Nmax Warna

Sebuah polling yang diadakan di sebuah forum Facebook Jagat Pembahasan Gadget menunjukan cukup banyak juga masalah atau kasus pengguna Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 dengan layar yang tidak normal seperti screen burn-in. Layar burn-in, berbayang, Redmi Note 5 Hal ini sebenarnya bukan sesuatu yang baru. Saya sendiri pernah mengalami di ponsel Samsung Galaxy S5. Tapi masalah pada ponsel saya dulu itu karena memang sudah lama, umur ponsel sudah 2-3 tahun pakai. Selain di Samsung, saya juga pernah mengalami di Xiaomi Redmi 3, layar bercak kehijauan di sekelilingnya. Waktu pemakaian kurang lebih 1 tahun, dan akhirnya dijual. Satu lagi pernah ngalami di Xiaomi Mi 4, yang ini bercak hijau juga tapi tidak terlalu jelas, hanya terlihat saat layar menampilkan warna hitam. Pemakaian hanya sekitar 6 bulan dan sudah dijual juga. Yang aman sih di HP saya sekarang Mi Note Bamboo, umur sudah hampir dua tahun tapi layar masih normal. Ok, kembali ke Redmi Note 5, ini baru rilis beberapa bulan lalu tapi sudah banyak yang mengalami masalah burn in. Berikut polling yang dilakukan seorang admin di group facebook Jagat Pembahasan Gadget OK. Gw banyak dengar bahwa Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 resmi, kena masalah layar belang atau screenburn. Tolong ikut polling dan komentar yak. JANGAN NAMBAH PILIHAN POLLING Yang KENA masalah ini, post gambarnya ya. Polling untuk yang pakai sendiri. Silahkan komentar kalau ada yang punya sodara atau teman yang kena masalah ini. . Jadi pengen tau, seberapa banyak yang kena. . Btw, ini untuk kami jadikan masukan kepada Xiaomi Indonesia serius Yg jawab ga sopan, siap2 gw kick. Polling itu sudah berjalan sekitar 9 jam dan hasilnya cukup mengejutkan 207 memilih "Gw pake Redmi Note 5, TIDAK PERNAH kena masalah layar belang atau screenburn." 90 memilih "Gw pake Redmi Note 5, PERNAH kena layar belang atau screenburn." Masa iya sih 207/90, ini hampir separuhnya! Ok, mungkin polling ini tidak akurat, tapi setidaknya ini menunjukkan bahwa kasus ini banyak dialami pengguna Redmi Note 5. Berikut beberapa komentar di thread polling tersebut Al Farizi cakeppp ni masalah dari jamanya Reno4 btw... semoga bneran masukan buat Xiaomi kedepanya dlu pernah pake Reno4 burn in. Andie Rahmatdiansyah dari pertama beli sampe sekarang, redmi note 5 4/64 resmi punya saya sehat-sehat aja gak screenburn Adial Firmansyah Jadi , namanya penyakit layar nya apa mas? Screenburn, burn in, atau shadow? Dedy Irvan Kurang tau.. Gw blm liat sendiri sih.. Redmi Note 5 gw baik2 aja soalnya Rocky Prabowo Istilah yang benar screen retention untuk layar LCD. M Fauzan Fawwaz Salam dari kemarin udah pantau grup nya redmi note 5 indonesia, banyak keluhan gini sih emang gak semua kena, tapi jumlah yg kena tergolong lumayan juga Diki Gumelar betul tuh, Redmi Note 5 punya saya belum seminggu pake udah screenburn. kasus nya sama seperti hp lama saya sebelum nya Redmi Note 4 dengan lcd yang sama yaitu tianma. jadi mau gak mau harus di ubah tampilan ke 'Dingin' biar gak muncul Screenburn nya. btw, saya selalu beli yang Resmi TAM sesuai anjuran grup jagat gadget. Christ Lr Redmi note 4 umur hampir 1 thn so far aman Hendro Pramudyo Saputro Poling Hanya untuk reno5 aja ya om? Karena masalah shadow di xiaomi udah sejak redmi note 4,terutama yg dapet panel lcd tianma Masalahnya sih di panel tianma nya, karena yg kena cuma di tianma sejak jaman reno4 Rahmat Ardiyanto temen kerja ane baru seminggu langsung kena om... note 5 4/64GB , di bawa ke SC ada part nya... sore datang pagi dah bisa diambil. Lutfi Zakaria gini ya . mau jujur aja nih, sebenarnya redmi note 5 itu sering masuk meja servis sy... karena masalahnya banyak. gk cuman screenburn aja sih. sistem anti rollback nya itu yg bikin hopeless. ketika upgrade os. dia langsung matot. atau kalo gk bootloop , dan ini susah utk di perbaiki... cara satu2nya yaitu di direct emmc nya atau ganti emmc nya kalo sudah kena anti roll back. utk screenburn sendiri yg masuk kesini sekitar 30 persen aja... garansi resmi mauun non resmi sama aja menurutku Yasin Yulianto Yep yg kena kayaknya banyak yg pake part nya LCD Tianma, temen juga ada yg ngalami. Gak tau deh redmi note 5 pake berapa vendor LCD nya. Biasanya yg bagus sih JDI nya ya, yg banyak di pakai di seri Mi nya. Tp gak tau redmi note 5 ada yg pake LCD JDI gak ya? M Fauzan Fawwaz Salam tianma, shenchao sama huaxing kalo redmi note 5 ini Rocky Prabowo Nah. Itu memang masalah yang pasti muncul kalau dapat device dengan layar dari vendor BOE. Redmi 4X saya dulu juga begitu. Selain ada stuck pixel satu, kalau panas sisi layarnya muncul bercak hijau, setelah diistirahatkan baru normal kembali. Dulu di Redmi Note 4 batch awal banyak yang kena masalah stuck/dead pixel seperti karena menggunakan layar dari vendor BOE. Rifqi Arief Alhamdulillah TIDAK KENA om... Karena pemakaian juga nggak jorok 😀, tapi saya punya kenalan, dia pakai RN5 juga baru pertama beli langsung kena burn-in... Alhasil langsung ke SC tunggu 1 jam kelar 😅 Kesimpulan dan Solusi Cara Mengatasi Masalah Layar Burn-in Dari diskusi tersebut ada beberapa hal yang bisa kita ambil ilmunya diantaranya Masalah layar burn-in ini tidak hanya dialami di Redmi Note 5 di beberapa tipe lainnya termasuk Mi A1, Mi 5 LCD Sharp, Redmi 4, dll.. Setiap smartphone walaupun tipe sama tapi dapat vendor LCD yang berbeda-beda. LCD yang sering bermasalah diantaranya Tianma dan BOE. Untuk menghindari burn-in pastikan selalu atur kecerahan ke level low, atau pakai auto. Jangan di set statis di kecerahan maksimum. Gunakan wallpaper yang gelap-gelap. Solusi jika kena burn-in, coba matikan HP selama beberapa hari. Saya pernah mematikan HP Samsung Galaxy S5 yang kena shadow selama seminggu dan LCD kembali normal. Klaim garansi ke Xiaomi Service Center. Cara Melihat Vendor LCD di HP Xiaomi Untuk melihat panel LCD nya dari vendor mana, Anda bisa masuk ke menu Settings > About Phone > Ketuk "Kernel Version" beberapa kali sampai muncul menu. Disitu ada info LCD, atau ada menu drop down/titik tiga di atas kanan, ketuk pilih Hardware. LCD Ebbg Catatan Tidak semua ada info LCD disitu, Mi Note punya saya juga tidak ada infonya disitu. Tapi di Redmi 5 punya istri saya ada info LCD. Sekian saja yang saya bisa share mengenai masalah screen burn-in. Untuk info lain bisa baca juga Apa itu Screen burn in? Jika Anda punya masukan, pengalaman, solusi, dll.. silahkan berbagi di komentar. Semoga bermanfaat, Terimakasih!

keluhan redmi note 5